![]() ![]() ![]() For example, our torts system is designed to compensate people for financial harm - to take from the offender the same amount of money as taken from the person offended. There are some areas of American law that seem like they employ the "eye for an eye" theory. 24:19-21)Īlthough Jesus told followers to turn the other cheek instead, "an eye for an eye" has persisted in the religious sense, especially in countries that use Islamic Sharia law. Just as he inflicted an injury upon a person, so shall it be inflicted upon him." (Lev. ![]() "And a man who inflicts an injury upon his fellow man just as he did, so shall be done to him fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The belief that "an eye for an eye" refers to reciprocal or mirror punishment being exactly that of the crime probably comes from Leviticus: The idea was to create a system of punishments so that people did not take the law into their own hands. As it appears in Babylonian Law, Hebrew Law, and the Code of Hammurabi, "an eye for an eye" was meant to keep people from retaliating on their own, for fear that the retribution would be worse than the original crime. The concept of specific punishments for specific social transgressions was developed in early civilizations for the most part as a limiting factor. Here's a look at where the "eye for an eye" idea came from, and why it might not be able to work in modern society: 'An Eye for an Eye': History But why is such a simple concept not used more our legal system? There short answer is no - there is no "eye for an eye" law in the American criminal code. But is "an eye for an eye" revenge legal? If someone wrongs you, you may feel like seeking retribution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |